The Life Part 1.

I have been using the online bookmarking tool since 2 January 2005. I have spent considerable time in the continual organization of my bookmarks. I search the bookmarks of others. I ‘steal’ ideas from other users as well as bookmarking the sites they also link to. I have 19 users in my network (i.e. I follow their bookmarks on the ‘Your Network’ page of my site) and I have 21 fans who watch what I save in my bookmarks. I have not yet taken advantage of the RSS feed that I could subscribe to (I use Bloglines at the moment) so I get the latest bookmarks of others in my RSS feed (already a busy read and I am hesitant on making it busier). What does all this mean? Well I believe I have a method to my use of So here is my own manifesto on 

There is already an extensive help section on is something that everyone should read who uses But at the same time it is a very flat and general description of what can be done using the tool and how it can be adapted to what is required by each individual. I began (of course) by opening an account. It lay dormant for a long time until a hard drive crash lost me a lot of links (for the pros and cons of public versus private links and much more on social tagging practices see danah. I decided to put as much online as I could, so then came the collecting. I put a button on my toolbars (saved in my log in settings on 3 computers: office, home and HUMlab…God, I need a laptop) and just clicked on sites that were relevant to my professional and personal life.  

Soon it got crowded and difficult to find things. I started organising them into what the Help site calls “bundles”: 

Bundles are a way to arrange previously-used tags into groups. For example, if you have the tags “design”, “painting”, and “moma”, you may want to group these together into a bundle called “art”. To create a new bundle, type the name of the bundle and click create. You can then start entering tags by clicking on the tag cloud below, or by typing tags directly into the text box. To remove a tag, click on the tag in the cloud or delete it from the text box. When you are finished, you must remember to hit the save changes button, or your changes will be lost.

 This is a bare bones description of Metatagging. In my experience, to organise tags as subgroups it has been necessary to prioritize the features of the tagged site. For example, I just bookmarked Wikibooks – a wiki that archives free text books online. Such a resource serves several functions; it could be classified under the tag ‘Books’, the tag ‘Wikis’, ‘Archives’ and ‘OpenEducation’. In a tag will be broken up if it is more than one word, so ‘Book’ and ‘Wikis’ are one tag each. ‘OpenEducation’ is my way of making a two word tag into one (there are other ways. It can also be done using underscore _ between words). This helps for clarity but it does get confusing after a while as many joined two word tags come very close to each other in the general tags.  I prioritize the order of the tags from most relevant (in the case of wikibooks for me it is ‘Books’ then ‘Wikis’ then ‘OpenEducation’) and this becomes relevant when tags are ‘bundled’ into meta-classes.  

I have bundled over 4000 tags into 20 Metatags and I use an interim Metatag of Unbundled as a sort of Triage or assessment. Like everything in a good folksonomy these classes are always being updated, divided into new classes, deleted, recycled and mutated. This is one of the strengths of; it teaches self-reflection by doing. The Metatags need to be general but specific enough not to overlap. They must be accommodating and relevant in that they allow for a broad range of subjects but clearly signify the connections between those subjects. Metatags need to be consistent and thematic. An example is my use of the Metatags; ‘Wikis’, ‘Archives’ and ‘OpenEducation’. There is some overlap between these but I have here made distinctions such as the importance of form (Wiki), the functional aspects of ‘Archives’ and the contextualisation of ‘OpenEducation’. The example of Wikibooks appears under the Metatags of ‘Media’ (Wikis), ‘Literature/Language’ (Books) and ‘University’ (OpenEducation). By my rational an entry made under multiple tags should not appear more than once under a Metatag as this lessens the need for multiple tags. If it needs a second tag it is because it has crossed over into a separate field in the metatags. 

Once the tags have begun to multiply then it is a matter of being attentive to your delicious site; spend time with it, watch your network grow, visit the ‘Popular’ and ‘Recent’ pages of, link your page to your other websites (your blog/s especially) using the button scripts offered by (there are some cool unofficial add-ons and tools as well). But the most important thing is using your bookmarks and that’s what I will write about in my next blog entry on  


This entry was posted in Networks, Web 2.0. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Life Part 1.

  1. Erik says:

    Thanks for the lesson ;-) I have started to think about organizing my bookmarks (although I only have 30 of them at the moment), and will read this post again, thoroughly, before starting.

  2. Patrik says:

    Looking forward to your next entry, Jim! Do you feel that the ontology you create (as represented by your individual view of your nextwork) stops you or forces you to categorize in certain ways? I am thinking of old-time thesauri, for instance, and their tendency to impose a structure on your thinking. Certain things belong here and others there kind of thinking. Or is there a point at which it becomes too big a deal (and too much of a change) to add a metatag or delete one? Do you pay a price for being consistent?

  3. Jim says:

    I suppose there is a price to be paid in any choice (Opportunity Cost?) but in my (fairly new found) consistencey I was more thinking about trying to integrate my profile with my other web activities. I have recently started tagging on my blog and (so far) I have tried to use the same tags I use for as I figured I have spent two years developing them as my own folksonomy. I am always changing my tags but it is becoming less and less I suppose as I settle into habits.

  4. Simon says:

    Interesting post. Do you actively try to keep the number of tags down? Do you feel that the words you use as tags have acquired a different meaning in your tag cloud than they have in ordinary English?

  5. Jim says:

    Yes Simon, I have to really think about new tags but they do emerge from time to time. I now use the Ctrl-f function to find tags in a hurry and it is getting difficult to find links sometimes (another good reason for multiple tags to a single link). I try to keep tags to a minimum as much as possible.
    The words I use as tags have, for me, come to represent what it is I do professionally. It is part of the reflective function I mentioned in this post (and will write about more in Part 2: The Working Life of Tags) in that I weigh up posting a tag to a link in relation to my research. An example is my ‘Narrative’ tag. Two years ago this was hot for me; I was pursuing narrative in new media like a man possessed. But under the whole of 2006 I only posted 10 links to ‘Narrative’ and 8 of those were in the fist half of the year. In the same period I posted 25 links to ‘GamesTheory’ spread throughout the year. I see this to represent a shift in my research focus and thinking about how stories are told in digital media. Although I am by no means a ludulogist I am trying to ‘take it all in’ as my own thinking develops.
    Thanks for the comment/questions Simon.

  6. Simon says:

    Interesting reply concerning idiosyncratic tags. I wrote about this a while ago. Unfortunately in Swedish — I don’t know how much you will understand… I look forward to the next part in the tag series!

  7. Jim says:

    Swedish I understand…I am not sure if Swedes understand my Swedish however ;-) More coming soon.

Comments are closed.