Visiting the KMI at the OU

Yesterday I had the opportunity to visit the Knowledge Media Institute here at the Open University campus in Milton Keynes. The Head of the Centre for New Media, Peter Scott, kindly showed me around the lab and told me about some of the many interesting projects they are running there, such as the Making the News project and the Xtreme Webcasting project. Apparently, my Moblogging Jokkmokk colleagues and I share some experiences with the Xtreme Webcasters, in that we have all tried blogging in thick gloves, but I have to say doing so while climbing a mountain does sound a bit more extreme than from a freezing market.

I was also shown some examples of projects in which they experiment with the notion of presence. For instance, one of the PhD students, Yanna Vogiazou, recently finished her PhD, in which she has combined virtual and physical presence in games like the location-based multiplayer game Cititag. At KMI, they have also developed different platforms with the notion of presence in mind, like BuddySpace and Hexagon. In the latter, you are represented by a video image which appears in a grid together with the images of the others (or of their empty offices if they happen to not be present at the moment). The platform facilitates synchronous voice and text chat, and thus provides an advanced instant messaging and presence indicator service.

The physical environment at KMI is also quite impressive, with a large area for demonstrations and many plasma screen displays. They also have a big hall where they webcast seminars, and in order for the online audience to get a chance to participate more actively in these, they use the Hexagon platform. This is similar to what we do in HUMlab, where we live stream our seminars and let distance participants interact via text chat. Our online audience is not represented by video images, though, but the mere appearance of their names in the list have a similar affect, in that their presence is indicated to both the speaker and the audience in the physical lab. Maybe we should try having video links as well at some point, to see how this might affect the dynamics of our seminars?

You can read some more reflections in my blog, Emerging Communications.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Visiting the KMI at the OU

  1. Stephanie says:

    The video in seminar sounds really interesting, but I wonder if it would be annoying to the presenter. I think I would find it distracting, trying to keep eye contact with a bank of video participants. I remember danah boyd doing a seminar via video and mentioning that it was quite uncomfortable. Do you think that, while neat in theory, video communication actually demands too much interaction from a distance participant?

  2. therese says:

    I don’t think that adding video will demand too much, especially since the small video images probably won’t pay a key role in structuring the conversations anyway, and you could certainly not keep eye contact with the distance participants in this type of setting (standing in front of a physical audience). The video images, I think, would rather mainly add more specific information as to whether logged on participants were actually also present in front of their computers, and whether they seemed to be paying attention to the presentation.

    I had a quite interesting experience myself with giving a presentation via video link the other week, where I actually tried to enhance the interactivity by giving the participants visual means of voting (green and red notes). Of course, this situation was quite different, since I did not have any physically present audience to pay attention too, but could focus all my attention on the video images on my screen. You can read more about this in my blog if you like: http://blog.humlab.umu.se/therese/2005/12/online_presentation_on_presenc.html.

  3. Patrik says:

    I have thought about this – not least after having taken part in an international live voice cermony recently (with voice and chat) as well as a four-part rather complex video conference situation (with an extra Marratech channel for additional content).

    One consideration is time lag (there is a 10-12 second delay for the stream). If video was just there for presence that would not be a problem but surely it would also be interesting to have q&a interaction. I guess we could ask video/voice participants not to use the live stream during q&a but rather to interact direcly through whatever platform we would use.

Comments are closed.